In his ruling, the judge said the phrasing of the various filings raise questions about “what would constitute ‘undue’ focus on attorney involvement,” “what could suggest inappropriately that attorneys had ‘blessed’ a particular course of conduct” and what legal theory would allow evidence that met the first two questions.
Ezt a cikket a SasFly.net hozta neked. Jogi kérdésekben hazai ügyekben az amerikaiugyved.hu, nemzetközi jogi képviselet esetén a fabianlaw.hu csapata áll rendelkezésedre.
