jnews-view-counter
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/html/hosting/lsd.hu/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114jnews
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/html/hosting/lsd.hu/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
\n<\/p>\n
Arthur Hayes, the Chief Investment Officer at Maelstrom and co-Founder as well as former CEO of BitMEX, has published a new essay titled \u201cThe Ugly,\u201d in which he contends that Bitcoin could be poised for a profound near-term pullback before ultimately marching to unprecedented highs. While retaining his characteristic bluntness, Hayes lays out two scenarios when to buy Bitcoin.<\/p>\n
Hayes\u2019 essay<\/a> begins by recounting a sudden shift in sentiment that caught him off guard. Comparing financial analysis to backcountry skiing on a dormant volcano, Hayes recalls how the mere hint of avalanche danger once forced him to stop and reassess. He expresses a similarly uneasy feeling about current monetary conditions, an intuition he says he last felt in late 2021, right before the crypto markets collapsed from their record highs.<\/p>\n \u201cSubtle movements between central bank balance sheet levels, the rate of banking credit expansion, the relationship between the US 10-yr treasury\/stocks\/Bitcoin prices, and the insane TRUMP memecoin<\/a> price action produced a pit in my stomach,\u201d he writes, emphasizing that these signals collectively remind him of the market\u2019s precarious situation prior to the 2022 and 2023 downturns. He clarifies that he does not believe the broader bull cycle<\/a> is finished, but he anticipates that Bitcoin could drop to somewhere around the $70,000 to $75,000 range before rallying sharply to reach $250,000 by year\u2019s end.<\/p>\n He describes this range as plausible given that equity markets and treasury markets appear, in his words, deeply entangled in a \u201cfilthy fiat\u201d environment still grappling with the vestiges of inflation and rising interest rates. Hayes points out that Maelstrom, his investment firm, remains net long while simultaneously raising its holdings in the USDe stablecoins to buy back Bitcoin if price falls below $75,000.<\/p>\n In his view, scaling back risk in the short term allows him to preserve capital that can later be deployed when a genuine market liquidation occurs. He identifies a 30% correction from current levels as a distinct possibility, while also acknowledging that the bullish momentum could continue. \u201cif Bitcoin trades through $110,000 on strong volume with an expanding perp open interest, then I\u2019ll throw in the towel and buy back risk higher,\u201d he writes on his second scenario.<\/p>\n In attempting to decipher why a temporary pullback might happen, Hayes asserts that major central banks\u2014the Federal Reserve<\/a> in the United States, the People\u2019s Bank of China, and the Bank of Japan\u2014are either curbing money creation or, in some cases, outright raising the price of money by permitting yields to rise. He believes that these shifts could choke off speculative capital that has elevated both stocks and cryptocurrencies in recent months.<\/p>\n His discussion of the US focuses on two interlocked perspectives: that ten-year treasury yields could rise to a zone between 5% and 6%, and that the Federal Reserve, while hostile to Donald Trump\u2019s administration, will not hesitate to reinitiate printing if it becomes essential to preserve American financial stability.<\/p>\n However, he believes that at some point, the financial system will need an intervention\u2014most likely an exemption to the Supplemental Leverage Ratio (SLR) or a new wave of quantitative easing. He contends that the reluctance or slowness of the Fed to take these steps increases the probability of a near-term bond market sell-off, which could weigh on equities, and by correlation, Bitcoin.<\/p>\n His political analysis homes in on the lingering enmity between Trump and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, as well as the Fed\u2019s willingness to forestall a crisis during the Biden presidency. He cites statements from former Fed governor William Dudley and references Powell\u2019s press conference remarks that suggested the Fed might alter its approach based on Trump\u2019s policies.<\/p>\nRelated Reading<\/span><\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
Related Reading<\/span><\/h2>\n<\/p>\n