Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

A crypto market expert has shared a grim Bitcoin (BTC) forecast, warning that a major price crash could be on the horizon for the leading cryptocurrency. The analyst noted that Bitcoin’s recent break below a critical support level may have opened the door for a deeper decline that could potentially send its price to much lower levels. He acknowledged that the market remains firmly in a bearish phase and expects more choppy price action before the anticipated breakdown occurs.

Why Bitcoin Could Face A Bad Crash Soon

A crypto analyst known as Tony Research has issued a warning to Bitcoin traders and investors, declaring “something bad is coming.” In an X post on June 2, he revealed that just a few hours earlier, Bitcoin had lost a key support level after testing and failing to hold the $70,000 zone. A few days before that breakdown, the analyst also noted that he had forewarned that such a move could occur.

Now, Tony Research has outlined what the broader market should expect moving forward. To provide more clarity and context, he also gave a detailed breakdown of the events and price movements that occurred before and during BTC’s latest support breakdown.

Before losing this key support, Tony Research noted that Bitcoin had undergone a deep price correction from the 0.618 Fibonacci level and the 200-day Moving Average (MA). He explained that the cryptocurrency had broken a long-term ascending channel that had been forming since the beginning of the year.

His accompanying chart shows that BTC had been trading within a narrow range inside this channel, breaking above it only once when it briefly surpassed the $80,000 level. That rebound, however, was short-lived, as the price quickly resumed its decline, leading to the current lows.

Tony Research added that Bitcoin is now trading below the Ichimoku Cloud after breaking the lower boundary of the ascending channel. He warned that this is a major bearish signal, potentially triggering Bitcoin’s largest price crash yet and putting investors and bullish traders at serious risk of losses.

What Comes Next For The BTC Price

In his analysis, Tony Research outlined the next moves Bitcoin investors should watch out for. First, he expects a bounce from $67,000 to around $74,000, signaling a short-term relief rally. 

After that rebound, Tony Research predicts BTC could plunge toward new lows below $60,000. His chart specifically points to key downside targets ranging between $56,000 and  $54,000. He noted that once this decline runs its course, the bear trap may be complete, potentially marking a final bottom for the cryptocurrency.

The analyst also warned that expecting a bull market at this stage would be “foolish.” He said investors should anticipate multiple short-term rebounds even as Bitcoin continues its downtrend.

Featured image created with Dall.E, chart from Tradingview.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

A crypto market expert has shared reasons why believes that despite the ongoing bearishness in the market right now, Ethereum (ETH) is still a better investment than Solana (SOL). Over the past few months, Ethereum has been in a slump, with its price falling below key support levels and underperforming the broader market. Meanwhile, Solana has seen its fair share of declines, plummeting by over 10% this past week. Despite the weakness across both assets, the analyst still picks Ethereum over Solana, citing ETH’s bullish drivers beyond price action and market trends. 

Why Ethereum Is A Better Investment Than Solana

Emperor Osmo, a market analyst on X has presented a compelling case for why Ethereum remains a stronger bet than Solana despite ETH crashing more than 9.5% in the past week to trade near $1,870 at the time of writing. The analyst said he understands why many market participants and investors have turned bearish on the ETH price, pointing to weak price structure and declining network fees.

Osmo noted that Ethereum’s fee revenue has fallen sharply, while Solana continues to close the gap. According to him, Solana has generated about $3.859 billion in annual app fees compared to Ethereum’s $3.868 billion. The difference now stands at only $9 million after years of ETH maintaining a dominant lead. 

The analyst also highlighted that Solana’s app fees are growing by roughly 9.5% per month, while ETH;s are declining by about 6.4%. Despite these trends, the analyst believes one key metric continues to support Ethereum’s long term bullish outlook. He revealed that the second largest cryptocurrency is currently sitting on about $161.8 billion in stablecoins, representing roughly 50.7% of all stablecoin value onchain.

Osmo also pointed to growing institutional interest in Ethereum’s ecosystem. He noted that BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, recently filed permissioned ERC-20 treasury products on Ethereum, picking the ETH blockchain above all others. 

In addition, the analyst referenced projections from the U.S. Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, that the stablecoin market could eventually grow to $3 trillion by 2030. Based on those figures, Osmo argued that if Ethereum maintains its substantial stablecoin market share, more than $1.5 trillion in value could eventually be anchored to the network. 

As a result, he believes that even if ETH’s current price reflects concerns around slowing fees and weak market structure, it does not represent its potential value backed by stablecoin growth and long term network retention.

Analyst Outlines Bull, Base, And Bear Case Scenarios For ETH

In an accompanying chart, Osmo mapped out bull, base, and bear case scenarios for Ethereum if it captures a significant slice of institutional stablecoin AUM. The analyst frames ETH’s potential upside against a projected $3 trillion stablecoin market, with retention hinging on whether the blockchain can ship what institutions need.

His bull case projects tokenized funds driving a 2,400% surge in ETH’s circulating asset market cap by December 2029. The base case puts that figure at 1,150%, while even the bear case holds upside at 400%.

Featured image created with Dall.E, chart from Tradingview.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

While talks are ongoing with key details still to be worked out, the outlines of a deal include Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz and letting ships pass without paying tolls, sources told Axios. In return, the U.S. would lift its naval blockade on Iranian ports and provide some sanctions relief, allowing let Tehran to sell oil openly.

But the most contentious issues must be settled during a 60-day window for talks. That includes Iran’s uranium as well as the U.S. permanently ending sanctions and releasing Iran’s frozen assets abroad, estimated at $25 billion.

The U.S. would also maintain its military presence in the region and only withdraw once a final deal is reached, Axios said. But Trump would still give up significant leverage.

“One of the problems with this approach and deciding that you will just deal with the nuclear issue later is that waiving sanctions on Iranian oil exports now will decrease, not increase, Iran’s motivation for reaching a nuclear agreement,” Eric Brewer, former National Security Council director for counterproliferation, said on X. “Also, by tying those sanctions to the Strait, you’ve lost your ability to reimpose them without a huge risk that Iran retakes control of the waterway.”

Reports that the U.S. and Iran are close to extending their ceasefire have shocked some Republicans, who fear Trump is poised to give away too much.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., warned against a deal that effectively recognizes Tehran’s ability to control the strait, saying it would represent a major shift in the regional balance of power and eventually become a “nightmare” for Israel.

Similarly, Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., said a 60-day extension would be a disaster and that “Everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury would be for naught!” Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, also piled on.

“If the result of all that is to be an Iranian regime—still run by Islamists who chant ‘death to America’—now receiving billions of dollars, being able to enrich uranium & develop nuclear weapons, and having effective control over the Strait of Hormuz, then that outcome would be a disastrous mistake,” he posted on X.

Despite the U.S.-Israeli bombardment devastating Iran’s military and economy, Tehran retained enough combat power to keep the Strait of Hormuz closed, using missiles, drones and fast-attack boats.

Meanwhile, Trump has signaled reluctance to resume attacks and break the ceasefire while also cutting short an effort to revive Hormuz traffic by using Navy warships to protect tankers.

With Iran holding the global economy hostage and oil markets due to go off a cliff in a matter of weeks, it has refused to budge on much of its demands.

But even the regime isn’t sure if it can believe the U.S. offer. That’s as previous rounds of talks earlier this year and last year ended in the U.S. dropping bombs on Iran.

“The deal in play looks like a win for Iran. But Tehran is not convinced that it is not a dress rehearsal for war now or in 30 days,” Vali Nasr, a former senior State Department adviser, posted on X. “In fact the more generous the terms for Iran the more the suspicion that U.S. is not serious about peace and wants to distract Iran ahead of another attack.”

As a result, Tehran will be focused on evidence that the U.S. military will back down, he added, and trusting the U.S. will be a “gamble” that Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei will ultimately decide on making.

U.S. Marine Corps

The Institute for the Study of War pointed out in a report Saturday that Iran’s regime believes it is negotiating from a position of strength “due to its victory in the war.”

Meanwhile, one of Iran’s primary objectives in negotiations is to secure its sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz, ISW added.

At the same time, the U.S. naval blockade isn’t eroding Iran’s grip because ships that haven’t entered or exited an Iranian port are still free to pass, even if they have accepted conditions imposed by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The world can’t wait much longer for the strait to return to normal, but dragging out talks helps normalize Iran’s de facto control, ISW noted in a separate report.

“The Iranians are likely aware of that fact, which is one of the reasons they are stalling and delaying the negotiations process,” it said. “The US and the world should not allow Iran to impose a new reality on this critical international waterway. If negotiations do not lead rapidly to an agreement to reopen the strait under the previous, internationally recognized transit scheme, then it will unfortunately be necessary to resort to force.”

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Ethereum’s current price structure is being compared to a phase that once played out in a major stock price, where years of sideways movement and repeated rejections eventually gave way to a powerful breakout above resistance. The comparison, shared by crypto analyst Crypto Tice on X, points out that what looks like long-term stagnation around $2,000 on Ethereum’s chart may be a setup that has appeared before in Netflix’s price history.

A Repeating Structure Inside A Range

Technical patterns have a way of resurfacing across different markets, which is why analysts often study past price behavior of one cryptocurrency to predict how another cryptocurrency could also play out in the future. In many cases, these comparisons stay within the crypto market itself or extend to traditional stores of value like precious metals, where similarities in cycles and investor behavior are easier to justify.

This analysis, however, takes a different approach by stepping outside those usual comparisons. It provides a comparison between Ethereum’s current price structure and the way Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) traded between 2003 and 2009.

The chart highlights a sequence of six distinct interactions with range boundaries in both assets. In Netflix’s case, the price spent years bouncing between support and resistance, forming a compressed structure with multiple failed breakout attempts. Each rejection added to the range but also built pressure over time.

Ethereum’s price action on a multi-year timeframe is showing a nearly identical formation. Since 2021, the Ethereum price has repeatedly pushed into resistance around $4,900, pulled back to support, and returned again for another attempt. 

The current price action, which is the sixth interaction, places Ethereum near the lower boundary of the range, which is just the same stage Netflix was before its eventual breakout.

Price Chart Comparison. Source: @CryptoTice_ On X

Pressure Building. What Comes Next?

The structure outlined in the chart ultimately points to one outcome: a breakout rally. This is how Netflix broke out of the resistance trendline in 2009. The important thing for Ethereum now is reclaiming and holding above resistance above $4,900 with conviction. However, there are other intermediate price targets that Ethereum needs to break above before this move. These targets include $2,150, $2,350, $3,100, $3,900, and $4,600.

The analogy, however, is not without its critics. Some comments argue that comparing Ethereum to Netflix ignores the fundamental differences between the two. One comment, for instance, noted that Netflix’s consolidation took place during a period of steady business expansion, with clear growth in subscribers and revenue supporting its long-term trajectory.

Ethereum’s situation, on the other hand, is more layered and has a different economic regime. The rise of Layer 2 networks has moved activity away from the base layer, reducing fee generation at the protocol level. These factors, and many others, introduce unknowns that cannot be represented through chart structure.

Featured image created with Dall.E, chart from Tradingview.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Bitcoin’s next move is one of the most debated questions in the market right now. One side sees the current price structure as a base for a push to new all-time highs, pointing to strength around $70,000 and repeated rebounds above this price level. Another camp believes the recent action is only a pause within a broader downtrend, with more range consolidation and lower levels still ahead before any real rally begins.

That divide is exactly where expert analyst Tony Severino steps in with a very cautious outlook. According to the crypto trading expert, Bitcoin might not see a rally again until complacency is crushed.

A Warning Against The Bullish Complacency

Severino, who posts under the handle @tonythebullBTC on X, recently declared that “the 16-year Bitcoin expansion is over.” This is a statement that carries particular weight given his track record. He had previously anticipated that Bitcoin’s bull run would end in 2025 and projected that the corrective wave ushering in a bear market could extend as far as mid-2027. 

Related Reading

Severino’s latest comments directly challenge the idea that Bitcoin is simply gearing up for another rally. The comments were in response to a sarcastic post by another analyst. In his view, the widespread belief that the Bitcoin price will continue to rise indefinitely is misplaced. 

Severino describes the current environment as one dominated by complacency, where investors have grown too comfortable buying dips without questioning the broader structure. According to him, it is because of people like this who think it will only go up forever.

Destruction First, Then Growth

The most important part of Severino’s outlook is not just that a downturn could happen, but that it is necessary. Only when that complacency is fully broken, he contends, can a new cycle begin on a stronger footing.

Related Reading

“This destruction and reset is necessary for growth again. But not until complacency is crushed,” he said. “Complacency says: ‘Same asset, same behavior.’ Reality: Same asset, different environment = different outcome distribution,” he continued.

This is not the first time Tony Severino has sounded the alarm of complacency for investors who are strongly bullish despite Bitcoin’s recent price struggles. Back in February, he pointed out that the Bitcoin price may have already reached a 16-year cyclical peak. 

Notably, this 16-year cyclical peak concept has become a recurring theme in his broader outlook. That same idea resurfaced again in his latest remarks, where he noted the complacency among some investors.

In another analysis, Severino predicted a somewhat -72% maximum drawdown from Bitcoin’s October 2025 peak price of $126,000. If that scenario plays out, it would place Bitcoin’s price in the region of $34,000 before a more sustainable bottom can form.

Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com

A crypto market analyst has outlined what he describes as a straightforward mathematical method that helped identify the bottom of Bitcoin’s previous bear market. By focusing on long-term Fibonacci levels and quarterly price behavior, the analyst argues that the same structural logic that marked the 2022 bottom is now shaping Bitcoin’s next macro phase.

Simple Math That Identified The Bitcoin Price Bear Market Bottom

In an X post shared on March 8, crypto analyst Chetan Gurjar revisited a prediction he made in December 2022 regarding Bitcoin’s bear market low. While he acknowledged that the timing of the call was slightly off by a few months, he stated that the price target itself proved accurate.

Related Reading

The analysis referenced Bitcoin’s bear market bottom around the $15,000 region in late 2022, which the analyst had previously projected using this framework. His approach centers on macro Fibonacci extension levels plotted on the quarterly chart, with particular focus on the 1.618 Fibonacci level positioned near $62,084.

The chart accompanying the explanation highlights how Bitcoin historically reacts to this macro level. During the 2021 bull cycle, Bitcoin repeatedly failed to break and sustain price action above the 1.618 Fibonacci level. The analyst pointed to the second and fourth quarter candles of 2021, both of which were rejected at that same zone.

These repeated rejections signaled strong resistance at the time, reinforcing the significance of the level in the broader market structure. By mapping these macro levels across cycles, the analyst argues that long-term Fibonacci mathematics can help identify both extreme lows and potential expansion targets.

Quarterly Fibonacci Retest Suggests Next Macro Phase

The analyst’s latest chart interpretation suggests that Bitcoin’s relationship with the 1.618 Fibonacci level has shifted from resistance to support. After breaking above the $62,084 region on the quarterly timeframe, Bitcoin has not produced a quarterly candle close below the level since the breakout.

The chart shows two notable retests following the move. In the second and third quarters afterward, Bitcoin briefly tested the level but managed to hold above it on a closing basis. One quarterly wick even dipped below $50,000 before reclaiming the $62,084 level. As of the current quarter ending in March, Bitcoin is again trading above the same macro Fibonacci level. According to the analyst’s interpretation, this behavior represents a bullish quarterly retest.

Related Reading

The projection drawn on the chart extends toward the next Fibonacci expansion level at 2.618, which sits near $393,874. Gurjar describes this level as the minimum macro target if the structure holds. The chart also signals potential volatility, suggesting price wicks could stretch toward the $500,000 region during the expansion phase.

However, the analyst notes that deeper quarterly wicks remain possible depending on broader market conditions, including potential weakness in the altcoin market. Even with that caveat, the framework presents the current structure as a continuation pattern centered on Bitcoin holding the 1.618 Fibonacci level.

Featured image created with Dall.E, chart from Tradingview.com

An important long-term technical signal is still flashing bullish as Bitcoin approaches an important point on the higher timeframe charts. According to CMT-certified analyst Tony Severino, the monthly SuperTrend indicator for BTCUSD has held support and is yet to display an active sell signal, even with recent market dynamics leading to contention as to whether the cycle has flipped bearish. His chart highlighted an interesting development on the one-month timeframe, where the structure has not yet transitioned into a confirmed sell.

Monthly SuperTrend Still In Buy Mode

In his post on X, Severino focused on the Bitcoin BTCUSD 1M chart and noted that the SuperTrend indicator has held support and kept its active buy signal. The monthly timeframe is particularly significant because it filters out short-term noise and shows a clear view of the broader cycle.

Related Reading

The accompanying chart shows Bitcoin trading around $66,300, with the SuperTrend level sitting just above $66,400. However, the indicator is still printing green on the monthly timeframe, which means that the macro trend has not flipped bearish. A monthly close below the SuperTrend line is what has always confirmed a sell signal, and that has not happened.

The visual structure in the chart also shows how previous bear markets were characterized by a clear transition from green to red on the SuperTrend. At present, that transition has not occurred. Instead, the Bitcoin price is consolidating around the SuperTrend support.

Bitcoin Price Chart. Source: @TonySeverinoCMT On X

Is The Bottom Close Or Is More Patience Needed?

Severino added an important caveat. According to him, almost all bear markets initially hold at support for a month or three before eventually turning into a sell signal. That observation points out that simply holding support does not automatically invalidate bearish risk. Although the analyst acknowledged that bear markets can linger at support before failing, he noted that the bottom is usually close after such behavior. 

Related Reading

Bitcoin ended February 14.8% below its monthly open, but it has managed to hold above the SuperTrend. That said, a confirmed monthly breakdown below the SuperTrend would materially change the outlook. Until that happens, the indicator is demonstrating that Bitcoin is still in a bullish structure.

Severino later shared another post discussing a separate analysis based on the quarterly Ichimoku indicator. In that analysis, he stated that historical evidence and data suggest Bitcoin could fall another 38% to 66% from current levels. A decline of that magnitude would imply a Bitcoin bear market bottom anywhere from $40,000 to $25,000.

Severino followed up in another post with a comment saying, “Sell, says the SuperTrend.” At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading at $66,000, down by 1.6% in the past 24 hours. The monthly structure has not fully broken, but the warnings indicate that the cryptocurrency may not be out of danger just yet.

Featured image created with Dall.E, chart from Tradingview.com

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The Ethereum price has not been immune to the sharp downturn that swept through the broader crypto market over the weekend. Selling pressure intensified into Monday, pushing the second‑largest crypto down toward the $2,150 level at its lows. 

Even so, some analysts remain confident that Ethereum’s longer‑term structure still points to significantly higher prices.

Ethereum Price Builds Long‑Term Breakout Pressure 

According to an analysis shared by market commentator Bitcoinsensus on the social media platform X (previously Twitter), the Ethereum price has been moving sideways on the weekly chart within a compression pattern that has been forming for roughly four years. 

This extended consolidation, the analyst argues, is building pressure for a major breakout once the range is resolved. Based on this long‑term pattern, Bitcoinsensus suggests that ETH could eventually target levels near $7,000 per coin. 

From current prices around $2,337 at the time of writing, such a move would represent a gain of roughly 200%. However, the analysis also carries a note of caution. 

Despite the bullish long‑term outlook, the Ethereum price may not move higher in a straight line. The analyst warned that price could first revisit the lower boundary of the compression channel, which sits near $1,700 on the weekly chart. 

If that scenario unfolds and the psychologically important $2,000 support level fails to hold, the Ethereum price could face an additional decline of about 27% before finding stronger demand.

Such a drop would further widen the gap between current prices and Ethereum’s all‑time high of $4,946, which was set last year. At present, ETH remains roughly 53% below that peak.

Next Growth Phase

Beyond chart patterns, other analysts point to fundamental factors that could support the Ethereum price over the longer term. In a recent report, analysts at The Motley Fool outlined several potential catalysts that they believe could drive ETH higher in the year. 

They argued that growth may come not only from increased network usage, but also from rising interest among institutions and corporate treasuries looking to gain exposure to digital assets.

One potential driver is broader adoption across the blockchain sector. The analysts noted that progress on stablecoin legislation and growing interest in real‑world asset (RWA) tokenization could mark a turning point for the industry as a whole. 

Staking is another area that could enhance Ethereum’s appeal. As a proof‑of‑stake network, Ethereum allows holders to earn rewards by locking up their tokens. Currently, most spot Ethereum exchange‑traded funds (ETFs) do not offer staking rewards, but that could change. 

In December, BlackRock filed paperwork with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for a staked Ethereum ETF, a move that the analysts believe could open the door to broader participation in staking through regulated investment products.

The evolution of layer‑2 networks is also seen as a potential tailwind. Analysts expect a combination of technical upgrades, economic incentives, and community‑driven initiatives to address what they describe as a value imbalance between the base layer and layer‑2 networks.

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com 

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Justin Bons, the founder and CIO of CyberCapital, has laid out a blunt and unsettling view of where Bitcoin could be headed over the next decade. In a detailed note shared on X, Bons noted that Bitcoin is moving toward total collapse within the next seven to 11 years, which is going to be caused by the way the network pays for its security and the continued fall of block rewards.

Reduced Miner Payouts To Cause Complete Bitcoin Collapse?

Bitcoin is known for its halving cycle, which reduces the block rewards given to miners by about 50% every 210,000 blocks, which comes up to about roughly four years. Bons’ critique focuses on this event as the reason why Bitcoin’s network security will finally fail and cause a complete collapse of the leading cryptocurrency.

As each halving cuts the block rewards further, Bons believes Bitcoin is drifting toward a point where it can no longer reliably fund the miners who protect the network, setting off a chain of risks that become harder to ignore with every cycle. 

Many Bitcoin proponents will argue that the Bitcoin network is still highly secure due to the rising hashrate. However, according to Justin Bons, hashrate can rise even while real security is weakening because advances in mining hardware reduce the cost of producing hashes. The most important thing is how much money is actually being made by miners, since that figure represents the profitability and the cost an attacker would have to match or exceed.

Charts tracking block rewards and miner revenue show that, in economic terms, Bitcoin’s security is already lower than it was several years ago. Keeping security at current levels, he says, would require either transaction fees so high that users would simply stop using the network or the price of Bitcoin to double every four years at a pace that would quickly outpace the size of the global economy.

Bitcoin Miner Revenue. Source: @Justin_Bons on X

Prediction: Bitcoin To Plunge In Two To Three Halvings

The seven to 11-year timeframe Bons outlined for Bitcoin’s collapse is tied directly to its halving schedule. According to the industry expert, the cost of attacking the Bitcoin network for a sustained period could fall into territory that makes such attacks financially attractive within two to three more halvings.

If miner payouts are low enough, Bons believes the potential rewards from hitting multiple exchanges or protocols could outweigh the cost of carrying out the attack. The most realistic scenario for this to happen is through double-spend attacks against exchanges. 

An attacker controlling 51% of the entire mining power could deposit Bitcoin, trade it for another asset, withdraw those funds, and then roll back the blockchain to reclaim the original coins.

He also highlights data showing that Bitcoin’s security budget relative to its total market value has been trending downward for years. This means Bitcoin does not automatically become safer as it grows larger.

Bitcoin Security Budget as % of Market Cap. Source: @Justin_Bons

This leaves Bitcoin facing an eventual breaking point. From here, it is either the network increases its fixed 21 million supply cap to restore miner incentives, a move that would likely split the chain, or the entire Bitcoin ecosystem accepts the risk of double-spend attacks.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Global risk desks are recalibrating their dashboards this week after prominent financial commentator and Bitcoin supporter Robert Kiyosaki reiterated his claim that the world is heading toward the “biggest crash in history.” His warning, amplified across markets already dealing with tightening liquidity and geopolitical volatility, has once again triggered fresh debate across traditional finance markets. The central question now circulating through trading floors and digital-asset circles is: if his prediction plays out, what would it mean for Bitcoin’s strategic outlook?

Why Kiyosaki Believes A Major Global Crash Is Approaching

In a post on X, Kiyosaki said the economic collapse he predicted over a decade ago in Rich Dad’s Prophecy is now unfolding. He pointed to simultaneous weakness across the United States, Europe, and Asia as clear evidence that the downturn is spreading globally. A major factor he highlighted is the impact of artificial intelligence on employment, which he believes could accelerate job losses across multiple sectors. According to him, these growing job losses will create additional pressure on both office and residential real estate markets, further deepening the financial strain on workers, businesses, and property markets.

Within this backdrop, Kiyosaki outlined the assets he believes are particularly important to hold during such a historic downturn. He stated that he intends to buy more gold, silver, Bitcoin, and Ethereum. While he positioned silver as the safest and most undervalued asset, predicting it could hit $70 in the near term and possibly $200 by 2026, he also made it clear that Bitcoin remains a strategic part of his crisis playbook and long-term financial strategy.

His repeated endorsement of Bitcoin—despite forecasting one of the most severe market declines in modern history—underscores that he views it as a strategic hedge aligned with the structural weaknesses of the current economy. He frames the crash as a wealth-transfer moment that could reward investors who are prepared and positioned with both digital assets and tangible, income-generating investments.

How Bitcoin Fits Into His Broader Wealth Strategy

While Kiyosaki briefly mentioned a recent sale of some of his Bitcoin in another X post, he clarified two key points relevant to understanding his broader positioning on Bitcoin. First, the sale was not an exit from Bitcoin; he remains bullish and intends to continue buying more. Second, the move reflects his long-standing playbook—using gains from one asset class to build or acquire cash-flow–generating businesses.

With this move, Kiyosaki demonstrates how Bitcoin fits into his system: an asset he accumulates during downturns, leverages during upcycles, and reintegrates into his portfolio to drive recurring income. By emphasizing both the severity of the crash and the continued relevance of Bitcoin in his strategy, Kiyosaki positioned the asset as part of the solution rather than part of the problem. 

Featured image created with Dall.E, chart from Tradingview.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.